Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | == Cluster-KPIs == | + | ==Cluster-KPIs== |
| | | |
− | === OEE(Overall Equipment Effectiveness)-Potential === | + | ===OEE(Overall Equipment Effectiveness)-Potential=== |
− | <math>Availability \times Performance \times Quality | + | <math>Availability \times Performance \times Quality</math> |
− | Availability = \frac{actual production time}{possible production time} \times 100 | + | <math>Availability = \frac{actual production time}{possible production time} \times 100</math> |
− | Performance = \frac{actual output}{possible output} \times 100 | + | <math>Performance = \frac{actual output}{possible output} \times 100</math> |
− | Quality = \frac{flawless products}{actual output} \times 100</math> | + | <math>Quality = \frac{flawless products}{actual output} \times 100</math> |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | '''Current estimated OEE:''' |
| + | |
| + | *Availability = 77,82 % |
| + | *Performance = 72,98 % |
| + | *Quality = tbd |
| | | |
− | Current estimated OEE:
| |
− | * Availability = 77,82 %
| |
− | * Performance = 72,98 %
| |
− | * Quality = tbd
| |
| → <math> 77,82% \times 72,98% \times tbd = </math> | | → <math> 77,82% \times 72,98% \times tbd = </math> |
| | | |
− | Target OEE: | + | '''Target OEE:''' |
− | * Availability = 77,82 % | + | |
− | * Performance = 72,98 % | + | *Availability = 77,82 % |
− | * Quality = tbd + x% | + | *Performance = 72,98 % |
| + | *Quality = tbd + x% |
| + | |
| → <math> 77,82% \times 72,98% \times tbd = </math> | | → <math> 77,82% \times 72,98% \times tbd = </math> |
| | | |
− | === TCO-Potential === | + | ===TCO-Potential=== |
| | | |
− | <math> TCO = Acquisition costs + Personnel costs + '''Energy costs''' + Maintenance costs + Downtime costs + Running costs (e.g., training courses) + Opportunity costs + Costs for operating materials + Disposal costs + Energy efficiency + '''CO_2 balance''' </math>
| + | TCO = Acquisition costs + Personnel costs + '''Energy costs''' + Maintenance costs + Downtime costs + Running costs (e.g., training courses) + Opportunity costs + Costs for operating materials + Disposal costs + Energy efficiency + '''CO_2 balance''' |
| | | |
| Saving potential energy costs: | | Saving potential energy costs: |
− | * Forming process: The forming process accounts for approx. 9.4 % of the energy costs in the processes considered (packaging to forming). | + | |
| + | *Forming process: The forming process accounts for approx. 9.4 % of the energy costs in the processes considered (packaging to forming). |
| | | |
| Current estimated TCO: | | Current estimated TCO: |
− | * Current energy consumption of forming process: 15 Ah per 870 mAh cell | + | |
| + | *Current energy consumption of forming process: 15 Ah per 870 mAh cell |
| | | |
| Target TCO: | | Target TCO: |
− | * Reduction of energy consumption in the forming process by 20 % results in a reduction of total energy costs by approx. 2 % (<math>20 % \times 9.4 %</math>)
| |
| | | |
| + | *Reduction of energy consumption in the forming process by 20 % results in a reduction of total energy costs by approx. 2 % (<math>20 % \times 9.4 %</math>) |
| | | |
− | == Project-KPIs ==
| |
| | | |
− | === Material consumption per unit === | + | ==Project-KPIs== |
| + | |
| + | ===Material consumption per unit=== |
| Models can be used to estimate the amount of electrolyte required and to reduce it. In contrast to the active material, a greater potential for reduction is seen here, since the active material has a direct influence on the energy content of the cell. | | Models can be used to estimate the amount of electrolyte required and to reduce it. In contrast to the active material, a greater potential for reduction is seen here, since the active material has a direct influence on the energy content of the cell. |
| + | → Contributes to the reduction of production costs (not listed in OEE/TCO) |
| | | |
| Current electrolyte consumption: | | Current electrolyte consumption: |
− | * 4 ml per 870 mAh cell | + | |
| + | *4 ml per 870 mAh cell |
| | | |
| Target electrolyte consumption: | | Target electrolyte consumption: |
− | * 3.5 ml per 870 mAh cell
| |
| | | |
− | Contributes to the reduction of production costs (not listed in OEE/TCO)
| + | *3.5 ml per 870 mAh cell |
| + | |
| | | |
− | === Energy consumption per unit === | + | ===Energy consumption per unit=== |
| The energy consumption per unit can be reduced by optimizing the forming process. | | The energy consumption per unit can be reduced by optimizing the forming process. |
| | | |
| Current energy consumption: | | Current energy consumption: |
− | * 15 Ah per 870 mAh cell | + | |
| + | *15 Ah per 870 mAh cell |
| | | |
| Target energy consumption: | | Target energy consumption: |
− | * 12 Ah per 870 mAh cell
| |
| | | |
| + | *12 Ah per 870 mAh cell |
| | | |
− | === Variable production costs === | + | |
| + | ===Variable production costs=== |
| The variable production costs are composed of the energy, material, scrap and manufacturing costs. | | The variable production costs are composed of the energy, material, scrap and manufacturing costs. |
| | | |
| Current variable production costs: | | Current variable production costs: |
− | * 100% | + | |
| + | *100% |
| | | |
| Target variable production costs: | | Target variable production costs: |
− | * 90%
| |
| | | |
| + | *90% |
| | | |
| | | |
− | == Literature == | + | ==Literature== |
| Rao et al.: Enhancing Overall Equipment Effectiveness in Battery Industries through Total Productive Maintenance, International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering (2017) | | Rao et al.: Enhancing Overall Equipment Effectiveness in Battery Industries through Total Productive Maintenance, International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering (2017) |
| Pettinger, K.-H.; Dong, W.: When Does the Operation of a Battery Become Environmentally Positive? Journal of The Electrochemical Society 164 (2017) | | Pettinger, K.-H.; Dong, W.: When Does the Operation of a Battery Become Environmentally Positive? Journal of The Electrochemical Society 164 (2017) |